Prediction of Tristan Schoolkate [119th] vs Emil Ruusuvuori [226th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L W W W L
Form
W L W L W L W W L LH2H: Schoolkate 0 - 0 Ruusuvuori
| Schoolkate | Stats | Ruusuvuori |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (15-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (5-6) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 119 | Ranking | 226 |
| 119 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 24 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 10 |
| 58% (184-131) | Career Total W/L | 61% (284-183) |
| $458,850 | Career Prize Money | $2,614,675 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Schoolkate VS Ruusuvuori H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tristan Schoolkate vs Emil Ruusuvuori Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schoolkate 0 - 0 Ruusuvuori
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schoolkate has won 45.91% of points on their second serve, while Ruusuvuori has won 42.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schoolkate, in recent form, has won 46.53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ruusuvuori has won 48.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.68% and 26.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schoolkate has saved 58.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ruusuvuori has saved 65.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schoolkate has won 59.76% of matches played (W/L 49/ 33), with Ruusuvuori winning 42.31% (W/L 11/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schoolkate has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 68% (W/L 21/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 24/ 22). Ruusuvuori has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 102/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 47/ 54).
- Player level: In the last year, Schoolkate has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 38/ 22), where as Ruusuvuori has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schoolkate has played against opponents with an average rank of 231.89 while Ruusuvuori has played against players with an average rank of 153.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schoolkate has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ruusuvuori has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schoolkate has converted 29.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ruusuvuori has converted 36.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Tristan Schoolkate Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Ethan Quinn
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Adam Walton
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
12
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Stefano Napolitano
64%
(
84 of
132)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
8
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
50 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
128
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
48%
(
39 of
82)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
106)
16
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
10
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Jurij Rodionov
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
109)
14
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
111
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
5
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Emil Ruusuvuori Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
54
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Matisse Bobichon
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Clement Chidekh
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Jan Choinski
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Schoolkate vs Ruusuvuori?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Schoolkate Vs Ruusuvuori is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (184/131) | Win/Loss | 61% (284/183) |
| 56% (412/325) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (640/463) |
| 52% (3762/3407) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5632/4931) |
| 0.61 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2142 | Aces Total | 1716 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1304 | Total Double Faults | 1366 |
| 1:45:24 | Average Match Time | 1:34:20 |
| 410.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 353.51 |
| 60% (13191/21848) | 1st Serve % | 65% (19948/30856) |
| 74% (9779/13191) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (14148/19948) |
| 48% (4185/8657) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5542/10908) |
| 40% (826/2075) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1303/3117) |
| 38% (8491/22159) | Return Points Win % | 40% (12713/31734) |
| 58% (179/308) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (269/431) |
| 67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 39% (11/28) |
| 50% (68/136) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (81/152) |
| 58% (57/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (74/132) |
| 90% (164/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (285/253) |
| 10% (164/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (285/32) |
| 25% (151/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (180/30) |
See recent tennis photos of Schoolkate and Ruusuvuori
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tristan Schoolkate
View full predicted draw for Schoolkate
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emil Ruusuvuori
View full predicted draw for Ruusuvuori
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
